Matic Dimic vs Denis Vishenchuk Vishenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Nov at 10:06 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Dimic vs D. Vishenchuk Vishenko

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dimic 1 - 0 Vishenko
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matic Dimic winning 2 and Denis Vishenchuk Vishenko winning 0. The last match between Matic Dimic and Denis Vishenchuk Vishenko was at the M15 Luanda, 10-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Matic Dimic getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dimic | 1 |
| Vishenko | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Luanda(11-10-25)
M. Dimic vs D. V. Vishenko H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.56% (99-93) | Career Total W/L | 48.00% (12-13) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Dimic vs D. V. Vishenko Match Preview:
- Matic Dimic has shown a 40.73% success rate on second serve points in the past six months, while Denis Vishenchuk Vishenko has a higher figure at 48.37%. Could this hint at an advantage for Vishenko in the upcoming match?
- When it comes to returning second serves, Vishenko again outshines Dimic with a 50.00% success rate, compared to Dimic's 40.33%.
- However, Dimic leads in first serve return performance, winning 33.47% of points over Vishenko's 23.50%.
- Both players exhibit similarities in critical breakpoint saves, with Dimic saving 48.91% and Vishenko saving 47.62% of breakpoints.
- In terms of match wins over the last year, Vishenko has a slight edge, winning 50.00% of his matches compared to Dimic’s 46.15%.
- Dimic appears most comfortable on clay with a 53% win rate, while Vishenko's best surface is indoor hard courts, also at 53%.
- The caliber of opponents faced in the past year shows Vishenko competed against higher-ranked players (average rank 35.08) than Dimic (average rank 80.69).
- If the match proceeds into a deciding set, Vishenko has been more reliable, winning 75% of deciding sets, as opposed to Dimic's 44%.
- Dimic has an edge in converting breakpoints, succeeding 34.72% of the time versus Vishenko’s 25.93%.
Editorial Prediction (November 10, 2025, UTC):
The statistics demonstrate Denis Vishenchuk Vishenko’s strengths in areas crucial for match prediction. His superior second serve performance and ability to return second serves more effectively suggest a potential upper hand.
While Matic Dimic performs well with first serve returns and gains slightly on breakpoint conversion, Vishenko’s consistency against high-caliber opponents and better performance in deciding sets provide him an added edge.
Considering the analysis, Denis Vishenchuk Vishenko appears to be the more likely winner for the upcoming tennis match.
Matic Dimic vs Denis Vishenchuk Vishenko Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Dimic vs D. V. Vishenko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:25:59 | Average Match Time | 1:25:59 |
| 65% (43/66) | 1st Serve % | 69% (42/61) |
| 67% (29/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (24/42) |
| 57% (13/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Pts Won % | 8% (1/13) |
| 46% (28/61) | Return Points Win % | 36% (24/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Dimic Recent Matches Played
D. V. Vishenko Recent Matches Played

M. Dimic vs D. V. Vishenko Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.56% (99/93) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.00% (12/13) |
| 51.61% (225/211) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.83% (26/32) |
| 50.71% (2201/2139) | Games Win/Loss | 48.05% (284/307) |
| 50.00% (22/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 52.78% (76/68) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 242 | Aces Total | 13 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 242 | Total Double Faults | 30 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 249.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 33.68 |
| 60% (3730/6173) | 1st Serve % | 59% (229/389) |
| 62% (2328/3730) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (151/229) |
| 45% (1096/2443) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (74/160) |
| 42% (260/622) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 28% (13/46) |
| 40% (2464/6098) | Return Points Win % | 37% (160/430) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.83% (99/92) | Futures W/L | 48.00% (12/13) |
| 52% (99/192) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 41% (18/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 48% (25/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (6/8) |
| 90% (93/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (12/11) |
| 10% (93/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (12/1) |
| 15% (99/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (13/1) |